Doc 1   Doc 19
  Doc 2   Doc 20
  Doc 3   Doc 21
  Doc 4   Doc 22
  Doc 5   Doc 23
  Doc 6   Doc 24
  Doc 7   Doc 25
  Doc 8   Doc 26
  Doc 9   Doc 27
  Doc 10   Doc 28
  Doc 11   Doc 29
  Doc 12   Doc 30
  Doc 13   Doc 31
  Doc 14   Doc 32
Doc 15   Doc 33
  Doc 16   Doc 34
  Doc 17   Doc 35
  Doc 18

Related Links
Lecture 2

Document 15 - Edmund Burke: Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790)

The English statesman Edmund Burke (1729-1797) spoke for conservative ideals, or what is often called “law and order.” While welcoming American independence, Burke was horrified by the excesses of the French Revolution because it brought radical changes that destroyed traditional institutions. Burke accepted the idea of gradual change, but emphasized respect for custom and tradition.

 

Society is, indeed, a contract. Subordinate contracts for objects of mere occasional interest may be dissolved at pleasure, but the state ought not to be considered as nothing better than a partnership agreement in a trade of pepper and coffee, calico or tobacco, or some other such low concern, to be taken up for a little temporary interest, and to be dissolved by the fancy of the parties. It is to be looked on with other reverence, because it is not a partnership in things subservient only to the gross animal existence of a temporary and perishable nature. It is a partnership in all science, a partnership in all art, a partnership in every virtue and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are dead, and those who are to be born. Each contract of each particular state is but a clause in the great primeval contract of eternal society... according to a fixed compact sanctioned by the inviolable oath which holds all physical and all moral natures each in their appointed place....

In this, as in most questions of state, there is a middle. There is something else than the mere alternative of absolute destruction or unreformed existence... I cannot conceive how any man can have brought himself to that pitch of presumption, to consider his country as nothing but carte blanche, upon which he may scribble whatever he pleases. A man full of warm, speculative benevolence may wish his society

 

otherwise constituted than he finds it; but a good patriot, and a true politician, always considers how he shall make the most of the existing material of his country. A disposition to preserve, and an ability to improve, taken together would be my standard of a statesman. Everything else is vulgar in the conception, perilous in the execution....

At once to preserve and to reform is quite another thing. When the useful parts of an old establishment are kept, and what is super-added is to be fitted to what is retained, a vigorous mind, steady, persevering attention, various powers of comparison and combination, and the resources of an understanding fruitful in expedients, are to be exercised; they are to be exercised in a continued conflict with the combined force of opposite vices, with the obstinacy that rejects all improvement, and the levity that is fatigued and disgusted with everything of which it is in possession....

Old establishments are tried by their effects. If the people are happy, united, wealthy, and powerful, we presume the rest. We conclude that to be good from whence good is derived. In old establishments various correctives have been found for their aberrations from theory. Indeed they are the results of various necessities and expediences. They are not often constructed after any theory; theories are rather drawn from them... The means taught by experience may be better suited to political ends than those contrived in the original project....

Questions for Discussion

  1. Does Burke promote revolutionary change, gradual change, or the status quo?
  2. With whom, in Burke’s view, does society contract?
  3. What must be preserved in Burke’s society?